This morning we each presented our powerpoints of our 'A history of...' Summer Brief. These were in small groups which was a great relief as my usual pre-presentation nerves all came back. The powerpoint went really well and I gained lots of positive and negative feedback to help me move forward. Here are some of the comments that I received:
Positive
- Good chosen topic idea's, current and new.
- Informative research process.
- In depth research, whole of olympics & associated things
- Lots of qualitative secondary research
- Good primary photographs, show really interested
- Excellent primary research
- Good Layouts
- Deep field of research
- Final in resolution
- Good layout research
- Lots of primary research
- Good organisation approach to the research
- Research into detail
- Lots of quantitative research
- Lots of visual / non-visual
- Nice layout
- Broad range of research
- Good knowledge of dates
- Nice outcome (informed and relevant)
- Good first hand primary research
- Thorough breadth of research
- Interesting research topic
- Good visuals
- Strong final product
Not so Positive
- Because presenting on a laptop, bit small to read, so some bits not clear
- Talk more about content of newspaper
- Maybe a bit to much on the slides
- More visuals on the slides
- Martin's video drowned you out (not your fault)
- Couldn't see images
- A lot of type
- Too much content
- Lots of writing on slide
- Just too much info on slides
- Some images are pixelated
- Perhaps less writing on actual powerpoint
- It's a shame more primary photos couldn't be used
- Maybe include more info
